Forensic Rehabilitation and Economics:
A Journal of Debate and Discussion

Author Index

Barros-Bailey, 1(2), 133-138; Berla, 2(2), 97-124; Carlisle, 1(2), 133-138; Casenave, 2(2), 97-124; Choppa, 1(1), 41-42; 2(2), 61-66; Clauretie, 2(2), 97-124; Dillman, 1(1), 47-50; 1(2), 95-100;2(1), 5-20; Dorney, 1(2), 131-132; Field, 1(1), 5-40; 1(2), 75-86; 87-88; 2(2), 61-66; Ford, 2(2), 97-124; Gamboa, 1(2), 63-74; 1(2), 101-108; 2(2), 97-124; Gibson, 1(2), 63-74; 2(2), 97-124; 137-142; Graham, 1(2), 133-138; Grimes, 1(1), 51-54; Hankins, 2(2), 67-84; Havranek, 1(2) 89-94; Jayne, 1(1), 55-57; 1(2), 75-86; 109-116; 2(2), 61-66; Johnson, 1(1), 41-42; Jones, 2(2), 97-124; Leitten, 1(2), 123-130; Missun, 2(2), 97-124; Neulicht, 1(2), 133-138; Newton, 2(2), 97-124; Reagles, 2(1), 37-42; Shahnasarian, 1(2), 123-130; 2(1), 43-60; 2(2), 85-96; Sidlow, 2(2), 97-124; Sink, 1(2), 117-122; Stein, 2(2), 125-136; Taylor, 1(2), 133-138; Tierney, 2(2), 97-124; Van de Bittner, 1(1), 43-45; Vega, 2(2), 97-124; Velez, 2(2), 97-124; Wallace 1(2), 133-138;

Title Index

A longitudinal study of claimants' return to work and related vocational factors, 1(2), 123-130. A response to "A vocational economic rationale" for vocational economic analysis using the New Worklife Expectancy Tables, 2(2), 125-136. A vocational economic rationale, 2(20) 97-124. An introduction to the New Worklife Expectancy Tables (Revised 2006). 1(2), 63-74 . Assessing the critical concept of earning capacity in forensic vocational analysis, 2(2), 67-84. Case studies: Comparisons of four approaches, 1(2), 87-88.     The sample case, 89-94.     Case review #1, 95-100.     Case review #2, 101-108.     Case review #3, 109-116.     Case review #4, 117-122. Case study #1: Adonna Frometa v. Mario E. Diaz-Diaz and All American Haulers and Recycling, 2(1), 21-28. Case study #2: Jane Doe v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, 2(1), 29-36. Cultural shock: Vocational meets economic, 2(1), 5-20. Earning capacity and vocational economics, 2(2) 61-66. Estimating earning capacity: Venues, factors and methods, 1(1), 5-40. Estimating worklife: BLS, Markov and disability adjustments, 1(2), 75-86. Perceptions of plaintiff or defense retention source as a confounding variable in the assessment of earning capacity claims: A reliability study of the Earning Capacity Assessment Form (ECAF), 2(2), 85-96. Recent court decisions: Implications for practice, 2(1), 37-42. Response to Dillman: Earnings capacity, the vocational expert, and the economist - A walk in the woods, 1(1), 55-57. Response to Dillman: Earnings capacity/worklife expectancy, 1(1), 51-54. Response to Field: Earning capacity assessment, 1(1), 41-42. Response to Field: Practice and research, 1(1), 43-46. The Earning Capacity Assessment Form: An exploratory study to assess the feasibility of establishing cut-off scores to determine impairment to earning capacity ratings, 2(1), 43-60. What an economist expects from the vocational expert, 1(1), 47-50. What does it mean? An N of 1. 1(2), 131-132. White paper: Who is the client in forensics? 1(2), 133-138.